Marriage amendment divides Black Christians


Local Black clergy on opposite sides express their views


By Charles Hallman

Staff Writer

The issue of same-sex marriage has been a controversial one for Black people, especially after President Barack Obama expressed his opinion on it last spring. The MSRspoke with two local Black ministers, one feels that the amendment represents “the Bible’s way,” while the other says it defines the GLBT community as the “other.”

Rev. Jerry McAfee of New Salem
Baptist Church
Photo by Charles Hallman

Rev. Jerry McAfee pastors New Salem Baptist Church in Minneapolis. He admits that the president’s announcement in May disturbed him, believing that it was ill-timed.

“I’ve been quite vocal on what the president did, not because he made the statement but at the timing of the statement. What I did not like was [that] he made the statement without talking to his African American constituents first — at least we could have helped him couch this thing in such a way that it would have been palatable.

“The other thing that I did not like,” continues the pastor, “is the polling at the time was saying that if he loses 10 percent of the African American vote, he could lose the election.

“While I’m for the president,” he believes Obama’s statements “caused major problems with Black preachers.”

“I am for the amendment because that is the Bible way,” explains McAfee. “The Bible is clear in its definition on marriage, and I don’t think anyone should try to change that. Does that mean I am against civil unions? No, I am not. I think there are ways men and women can get what they want without changing the institution of marriage.”

Rev. Jacson Moody of Holsey
Memorial Christian Methodist
Episcopal Church
Photo courtesy of Rev. Moody

Rev. Jacson Moody is pastor of Holsey Memorial Christian Methodist Episcopal (CME) Church. “I feel like the very presence of the amendment on the ballot is detrimental to Minnesotans that will be affected by it” if passed, he says. He believes the constitutional amendment is an attempt to marginalize a group that is not part of the dominant culture. “Whenever you consider them ‘other,’ that is detrimental to society,” he says.

“When you take a segment of our society and you say to them that you don’t have the right…to come together and share a life, where everything is shared, it is taking away the right for a particular segment of our population to have a pursuit of happiness,” he says. “Men and women have the right to be happy, or the right to share their lives together if that’s what they want to do.”

Moody is aware of the backlash President Obama received because of his statement supporting same-sex marriage in May. “Most Black clergy came out and really had problem with it,” but Moody surmises that those ministers who support the Minnesota marriage amendment have “narrow viewpoints.”

“I believe very strongly that the Civil Rights Movement extends out to [LGBT} individuals… We all should have equal rights,” says Rev. Moody. “We are on the wrong side of history on November 6 by voting for the amendment. It is going to cause barriers and walls to be built up around a segment of our society that is truly deserving of a right to share a piece of the American Dream. I do not agree nor do I support the amendment. And as a Black clergy person, I know that I am…in the minority of Black clergy, but I find it appalling that people that have suffered the way African Americans have suffered in this country, that we can come out against any segment of our society.”

McAfee refuses to compare the struggles of LGBT persons to the historical struggles of Blacks. “While I would never deny that gays and lesbians have had trials and tribulations, no one normally knows your sex[ual orientation] unless you tell them. They know your skin color.

“I’m voting yes” on the marriage amendment in November, McAfee pledged. “I believe that marriage should be defined as [between] a man and a woman.”


Charles Hallman welcomes reader responses to 



One Comment on “Marriage amendment divides Black Christians”

  1. My fellow Minnesotans, I have heard quite a bit on this subject and I reiterate my stance by saying, “I believe very strongly that the Civil Rights Movement encompasses all people. Yes, especially people that are a part of the L.G.B.T.Q.Q. community. We are all deserving of equal rights. Our nation needs to strive toward the removing of the barriers and walls that serve as a symbol of denial and hatred. These walls are often constructed to promote the dominant culture’s illusion of power over the weak.

    Same-gender-loving people deserve the unalienable right that comes from being able to commit to the person of their choice. It is incredibly narrow minded of our society to be so intrigued by the activities of our neighbor’s bedroom. Furthermore, when did it become so important for us to focus on what two consenting adults do with their genitals?

    As a Black clergy person, I know that I am going to be ostracized among my peers for my beliefs, but I have to side with the oppressed persons that are screaming out from the margins. Liberation Theology teaches that God has a preferential option for the oppressed. Simply put, God is on the side of the oppressed. If I must err, I will err on the side of the marginalized of our society.

    I find it appalling that people that have suffered the way African-Americans have suffered in this country can come out against any segment of our society. We cannot be advocates for the alienation of our brothers and sisters that are same gender loving. It is absolutely morally criminal to treat anyone as a social leper for any reason. On November 6th, we have to send a message to the world. We are not afraid to allow the gospel to be liberative to all.”

    Peace and Blessings,
    Pastor Jacson L. Moody, Jr.

Comments are closed.